Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[@types/selectize] Add types for missing methods #69378

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codershiba
Copy link
Contributor

@codershiba codershiba commented Apr 17, 2024

Closes #69336
Closes #69377

Please fill in this template.

If changing an existing definition:

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented Apr 17, 2024

@codershiba Thank you for submitting this PR!

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

2 packages in this PR

Code Reviews

This PR can be merged once it's reviewed.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

  • ✅ No merge conflicts
  • ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
  • 🕐 Type definition owners or DT maintainers needs to approve changes which affect more than one package

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.


Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR
{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 69378,
  "author": "codershiba",
  "headCommitOid": "634d3a78c6549a98c63fa88bbeadd40bf6da8fa2",
  "mergeBaseOid": "895d2be48edd77037fb8920161d109059d600002",
  "lastPushDate": "2024-04-17T10:44:15.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2024-05-29T13:01:55.000Z",
  "maintainerBlessed": "Waiting for Code Reviews",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": false,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Critical",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "node",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/node/buffer.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/node/dgram.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        },
        {
          "path": "types/node/events.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "Microsoft",
        "jkomyno",
        "alvis",
        "r3nya",
        "btoueg",
        "smac89",
        "touffy",
        "DeividasBakanas",
        "eyqs",
        "Hannes-Magnusson-CK",
        "hoo29",
        "kjin",
        "ajafff",
        "islishude",
        "mwiktorczyk",
        "mohsen1",
        "galkin",
        "parambirs",
        "eps1lon",
        "ThomasdenH",
        "WilcoBakker",
        "wwwy3y3",
        "samuela",
        "kuehlein",
        "bhongy",
        "chyzwar",
        "trivikr",
        "yoursunny",
        "qwelias",
        "ExE-Boss",
        "peterblazejewicz",
        "addaleax",
        "victorperin",
        "ZYSzys",
        "NodeJS",
        "LinusU",
        "wafuwafu13",
        "mcollina",
        "Semigradsky"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Critical"
    },
    {
      "name": "selectize",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/selectize/index.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "adidahiya",
        "naBausch"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Popular"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [
    {
      "type": "approved",
      "reviewer": "mcollina",
      "date": "2024-05-29T13:01:55.000Z",
      "isMaintainer": false
    },
    {
      "type": "changereq",
      "reviewer": "sheetalkamat",
      "date": "2024-05-28T20:29:45.000Z"
    }
  ],
  "mainBotCommentID": 2060967891,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Popular package This PR affects a popular package (as counted by NPM download counts). Untested Change This PR does not touch tests labels Apr 17, 2024
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added this to Waiting for Code Reviews in New Pull Request Status Board Apr 17, 2024
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Apr 17, 2024
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Code Reviews to Needs Author Action in New Pull Request Status Board Apr 17, 2024
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@codershiba The CI build failed! Please review the logs for more information.

Once you've pushed the fixes, the build will automatically re-run. Thanks!

Note: builds which are failing do not end up on the list of PRs for the DT maintainers to review.

@typescript-bot typescript-bot removed the The CI failed When GH Actions fails label Apr 17, 2024
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Author Action to Waiting for Code Reviews in New Pull Request Status Board Apr 17, 2024
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Code Reviews to Needs Maintainer Review in New Pull Request Status Board Apr 17, 2024
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Re-ping @adidahiya, @naBausch:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added the Unreviewed No one showed up to review this PR, so it'll be reviewed by a DT maintainer. label Apr 28, 2024
@iisaduan iisaduan moved this from Needs Maintainer Review to Waiting for Code Reviews in New Pull Request Status Board Apr 29, 2024
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Waiting for Code Reviews to Needs Maintainer Action in New Pull Request Status Board May 5, 2024
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

typescript-bot commented May 5, 2024

@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

As in the other PR, DT is at 0.12, and this package upstream is at 0.15; can you verify which versions things were added?

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Critical package Edits multiple packages and removed Popular package This PR affects a popular package (as counted by NPM download counts). labels May 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sheetalkamat sheetalkamat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need info on versions per #69378 (comment)

@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Revision needed This PR needs code changes before it can be merged. and removed Unreviewed No one showed up to review this PR, so it'll be reviewed by a DT maintainer. labels May 28, 2024
@typescript-bot typescript-bot moved this from Needs Maintainer Action to Needs Author Action in New Pull Request Status Board May 28, 2024
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@codershiba One or more reviewers has requested changes. Please address their comments. I'll be back once they sign off or you've pushed new commits. Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@codershiba codershiba marked this pull request as draft May 30, 2024 15:43
@peterblazejewicz
Copy link
Member

@codershiba please do not mix scopes in PRs, like here, very active, critical Node package, and clearly defunct sequelize project, which is migrated and hosted on different GH repo than original one, oh, looks it now has its own DT declaration files, clearly copied from DT:
https://github.com/selectize/selectize.js/blob/master/index.d.ts
but the package.json does not publish them to NPM repo.
What should DT maintainers do?
I would say, skip sequelize (we can close issue for non-active project) and stay focused on Node

@codershiba
Copy link
Contributor Author

@codershiba please do not mix scopes in PRs, like here, very active, critical Node package, and clearly defunct sequelize project, which is migrated and hosted on different GH repo than original one, oh, looks it now has its own DT declaration files, clearly copied from DT: https://github.com/selectize/selectize.js/blob/master/index.d.ts but the package.json does not publish them to NPM repo. What should DT maintainers do? I would say, skip sequelize (we can close issue for non-active project) and stay focused on Node

Really sorry, the last commit was added on the wrong branch and ending up pinging the node maintainers. I apologise again and will take care of this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Critical package Edits multiple packages Revision needed This PR needs code changes before it can be merged. Untested Change This PR does not touch tests
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

@types/selectize : Missing methods clearOptionGroups, removeOptionGroup and addItems
6 participants